Field notes / documented, not tested
The premise, written in daylight.
These essays take EroLove's published terms, pricing and privacy policy seriously enough to ask uncomfortable questions. They do not invent chat sessions or diagnose users. Choose the boundary that matters to you, then keep the decision yours.
01
EroLove Is Not a Person: Read the Terms Behind the Romance
The provider's own terms describe a fictional AI with no feelings; use that fact to set expectations before chatting.
02
When an AI Remembers Intimate Details, Set a Boundary First
A practical disclosure ladder for EroLove memory, model processing, correction and deletion claims.
03
The ‘Texts First’ Feature Can Feel Personal; It Is Still Product Design
Read EroLove's proactive-message promise as a feature, then set notification and attention boundaries yourself.
04
Do Not Use EroLove as Crisis or Health Advice
The provider's terms exclude professional care; a practical rule for deciding when a human source is necessary.
05
A Better Question Than ‘Does EroLove Love Me?’
A private worksheet that turns a romantic AI promise into specific expectations you can evaluate honestly.
Independent criticism, unaffiliated with EroLove. We read published documents; we have not used an account or measured personal outcomes.