How these notes are written

One fact, one limit, one useful choice.

Our articles begin with a reader question and a dated primary-source check. A provider document establishes what the provider says. It cannot by itself establish actual performance, enforcement or an individual outcome. We explicitly distinguish our criticism and inference from those source statements.

What is not presented as experience

We have not chatted with EroLove, tested memory, received a proactive text, bought Premium, deleted an account or assessed clinical effects. We do not fabricate screenshots, transcripts or a reviewer identity. If we later perform a relevant test, the article will state its method, date and limit.

Why the tone is critical

We think a product built around intimacy should surface the fact that its characters are AI, its replies can be wrong, and a sensitive conversation has a data path. That is an editorial judgment grounded in the public terms and privacy policy. It is not an assertion that an individual user was injured.

Corrections and release

Future essays are reviewed before their weekly release. A date alone does not make an unchecked claim true. We update material facts when they change and leave the original publication date intact. We do not publish an allegation of fraud, illegality or failed child safeguards without direct evidence.